Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

notriddle and others added 17 commits February 9, 2023 18:13
…stutter, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: clean up `write!` calls with less stuttering
…lbertlarsan68

Emit JSON output for the building of bootstrap itself

Fixes rust-lang#107832 .
Main changes are from line 792 onwards. Other changes are due to the flake8 formatter. Let me know if I should not use the formatter.
…ocs, r=notriddle

Reexported macros docs

Part of rust-lang#59368 (doesn't fix it, only improve the current situation a bit).

Macros were not correctly handled in reexports and the reexport attributes were not merged with the item either. This PR fixes both.

r? `@notriddle`
…r-empty-cond, r=camelid

rustdoc: remove redundant `if s.is_empty()` from `find_testable_code`
…melid,GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: Don't resolve link to field on different variant

Fix rust-lang#107903

This also gives a more specific diagnostic when the enum has any fields
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 11, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

📌 Commit c8614a7 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

⌛ Testing commit c8614a7 with merge 2b3f260...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 2b3f260 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 2b3f260 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 11, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 2b3f260 into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha

previous master: 2b3f260e74

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#107912 c23b89b3606d947ecc9e647a8b04515278c6477d
#107909 be8d8223ee7ba05534af64f626e2a0236d6e8aa7
#107897 57918420e2ef2439012f0ac6116bfa91145de29a
#107895 ce059e911c72739ce3ea57c813af603ab97dfdef
#107873 8afc211a520920e5f960a7230096fc4d442332cb
#107864 4e62ab484ed8123fbcce573bf663cbbe944904b6
#107657 f7481f67524a05037b90640e7a924301ba4cceff

previous master: 8dabf5da9e

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (2b3f260): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.3%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.6% [-1.9%, -1.4%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants